by In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once supplied many jobs have vanished. Now, the county is labeled as a “food desert,” indicating residents are often distant from grocery stores. Acknowledging this challenge, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016, working with farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruits and vegetables across the area, where around 30% of the population is Black, and about 25% face poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she admitted. “It was one of those moments where you realize that someone truly sees and values your work.”
Just two years ago, programs like this were widely backed by major corporations across the U.S., as the country reckoned with systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who died under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
However, many of these corporations are now retreating from such commitments. In November, Walmart announced the discontinuation of some diversity initiatives, including plans to shut down its Center for Racial Equity, which had been instrumental in funding Ms. Ashby’s grant.
Companies such as Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have all made similar moves, reflecting a broader corporate pullback from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
This change signifies a significant cultural transition, spurred partially by concerns over legal challenges, regulatory oversight, and social media backlash—pressures intensified by the new U.S. president.
Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously attempted to dismantle DEI programs, promoting a revival of “merit-based opportunity” within the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI initiatives and commence inquiries into private companies and educational establishments suspected of participating in “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put almost 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump replaced the nation’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary had previously implied he should be dismissed due to his ties with “woke” DEI policies.
At first glance, it might appear that the U.S. has given up on improving outcomes for historically marginalized racial and identity groups. Yet, some experts propose that these programs may continue, though perhaps rebranded to match the evolving political environment of a country that has recently chosen a leader focused on contesting “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
DEI-style programs first gained momentum in the U.S. during the 1960s in response to the civil rights movement, which sought to expand and protect the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described with terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the systemic discrimination perpetuated under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements expanded to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language describing these efforts widened to embrace “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment strategies that positioned diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents contend that these programs tackle inequalities across different communities, although the primary focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
However, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
More recently, critics have amplified their claims that DEI initiatives—initially intended to fight discrimination—are in themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Sessions focusing on “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
The basis of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic model proposing that racism is deeply ingrained in American society. Over time, campaigns against CRT in educational institutions evolved into wider attempts to target “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative personalities like Robby Starbuck have leveraged this sentiment, focusing on corporations for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has asserted accountability for policy changes at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after highlighting their DEI programs to his digital audiences.
One prominent success for this movement occurred in spring 2023, when Bud Light encountered significant backlash for collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Boycott calls targeting the brand and its parent firm, Anheuser-Busch, led to a 28% drop in Bud Light sales, according to an analysis by Harvard Business Review.
Another significant milestone came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decreed that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This verdict questioned the legality of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the ruling, Meta notified its employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the discontinuation of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The swift reversal of DEI programs by major corporations prompts questions about the genuineness of their pledges to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.
Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.
